top of page

I Was Wrong: The Title Wasn’t Killing Me. The Misalignment Was.

This personal reflection explores how misdiagnosed burnout and leadership misalignment can lead even the most ambitious executives off course.

898D3D66-A056-45DF-88C3-9078FC35180E.PNG

I Was Wrong: The Title Wasn’t Killing Me. The Misalignment Was.

I used to think the C-suite was the thing that would kill me.

That sounds dramatic until you have watched someone you love die slowly from a life that never gave their body permission to rest. From 2019 to 2023 I watched my father die a long, painful death tied to work-related stress. Not the polished, socially acceptable kind of stress people casually mention over coffee. I mean the kind that settles into the nervous system, changes a person over time, and steals sleep, softness, health, presence, and years that should have belonged to family.

Watching that happen changed me. It forced me to look at my own life with a level of honesty I had been avoiding, because the truth was becoming harder to ignore: I could see the same road forming under my feet and in my body with serious ailments. 

At the time, I was in the C-suite. I carried revenue pressure, people pressure, market pressure, and the invisible weight of being one of the people expected to know what to do when the room got tense. On paper, I was successful. In real life, I was not okay.

My relationship was failing, and eventually it did fail. I was a mother of three, including a severely disabled child, and there were moments when I knew my body was physically present, but the best of me had already been spent somewhere else. I loved my children deeply, but love alone does not create presence when your nervous system is living in a constant state of commercial emergency.

My body was trying to tell me the truth, too. It had been whispering for a while, then it started raising its voice. Stress was not staying neatly inside my calendar. It was showing up in my health, my patience, my relationships, and my ability to feel like a whole person instead of a high-functioning machine with a good email tone.

So I made a decision.

I stepped away from the C-suite.

At the time, I believed I was choosing life over ambition. I believed the title was the danger. I believed the level of leadership was the source of the stress. I thought that if I took a lesser role, lowered the external pressure, and stepped out of that executive altitude, I would become healthier, calmer, more present, more human.

There was truth in that decision. And there was also a flawed diagnosis. 

Three years later, I can say something more honest: I was wrong.

Not wrong that stress kills. It does. Not wrong that work can consume a life while everyone around you calls it dedication. It can. Not wrong that success can become a socially acceptable form of self-abandonment. It absolutely can.

I was wrong that the title itself was the thing killing me.

It was not the C-suite.

It was misalignment. It was toxicity. It was being in environments where the work demanded everything but did not always deserve that level of sacrifice. It was being surrounded by urgency without strategy, politics without trust, numbers without foundation, and leadership decisions that created chaos for the people expected to execute them. It was loving work that mattered while being trapped inside systems that made the work harder, less honest, and less human than it needed to be.

That is the distinction I missed.

A smaller title does not automatically create a healthier life. A lesser role on paper does not guarantee less stress. Sometimes it creates a different kind of stress: less authority, less influence, and less ability to fix what you can clearly see is broken.

There is a particular frustration that comes from knowing how the commercial engine should work and watching decisions be made that will damage the forecast, weaken backlog, confuse the market, exhaust the team, and then somehow still become everyone else’s emergency later. That kind of stress is not lighter just because the title is lower. Sometimes it is worse.

Because in a healthy environment, responsibility comes with agency. You can shape the system. You can build the team. You can tell the truth earlier. You can connect strategy to execution. You can create a culture where people are not constantly asked to rescue the consequences of leadership avoidance.

But in a misaligned environment, you may see the whole pattern and still be expected to make yourself small enough to survive it.

That is not balance. It is a slow erosion.

I think a lot of people misdiagnose their burnout this way. They think the problem is ambition. They think the problem is seniority. They think the problem is that they cared too much, wanted too much, or accepted too much responsibility.

Sometimes that is true.

But sometimes the problem is not that you are leading at a high level. Sometimes the problem is that you are working in a place where the values are wrong. A place where optics matter more than honesty. A place where people talk about strategy but reward reaction. A place where the loudest voices get protected and the clearest voices get labeled difficult. A place where urgency is used to cover poor planning. A place where people are treated as replaceable until the company suddenly needs their institutional knowledge, relationships, and nervous systems to save the quarter.

That kind of environment will damage you at any level.

Director. VP. CRO. Founder. Individual contributor. It does not matter.

Toxicity is not impressed by your title. And neither is your body.

What I know now is that I do not want a smaller life. I want an aligned one.

That matters because I am not someone who wants work to be meaningless. I am not wired that way. I want to build. I want to contribute. I want to make complicated things clearer. I want to help companies grow in ways that are strategic, ethical, repeatable, and real. I want the work to matter because a life spent doing work that does not matter feels like its own kind of grief.

I love the intersection of revenue, strategy, technical complexity, and human behavior. I love taking something complex and making the market understand why it matters. I love building the story behind the commercial engine. I love connecting the numbers to the people, decisions, and systems that create them.

I do not want work to be smaller. I want it to be healthier. 

My father’s death taught me that work-related stress can steal a life. My own life taught me that stepping away from a title does not automatically save one.

The real question is not, “How senior is the role?”

The real questions are harder:

Is the work aligned with who I am and what I value?

Does the environment reward honesty or punish it?

Do I have enough authority to match the responsibility I am carrying?

Am I building something meaningful, or just helping maintain dysfunction with better language?

Can I bring my full self to this work without losing myself inside it?

Those are the questions I wish more leaders asked before they burned out, broke down, walked away, or convinced themselves the only path to peace was becoming less ambitious.

I do not believe that anymore.

I believe ambition can be healthy when it is rooted in meaning. I believe leadership can be life-giving when it is aligned with truth. I believe responsibility can be carried without letting it become identity. I believe work can matter deeply without becoming the altar where everything else gets sacrificed.

So yes, I was wrong.

The title was not the thing killing me.

The misalignment was.

And maybe the answer was never to abandon leadership altogether. Maybe the answer was to return to it differently: clearer, healthier, more honest, less willing to confuse chaos with importance, and far less willing to give my whole life to work that has not earned that much of me.

“Three years later, I can say something more honest: I was wrong”

I was wrong that the title itself was the thing killing me.

It was not the C-suite.

It was misalignment. It was toxicity. It was being in environments where the work demanded everything but did not always deserve that level of sacrifice. It was being surrounded by urgency without strategy, politics without trust, numbers without foundation, and leadership decisions that created chaos for the people expected to execute them. It was loving work that mattered while being trapped inside systems that made the work harder, less honest, and less human than it needed to be.

That is the distinction I missed.

A smaller title does not automatically create a healthier life. A lesser role on paper does not guarantee less stress. Sometimes it creates a different kind of stress: less authority, less influence, and less ability to fix what you can clearly see is broken.

There is a particular frustration that comes from knowing how the commercial engine should work and watching decisions be made that will damage the forecast, weaken backlog, confuse the market, exhaust the team, and then somehow still become everyone else’s emergency later. That kind of stress is not lighter just because the title is lower. Sometimes it is worse.

Because in a healthy environment, responsibility comes with agency. You can shape the system. You can build the team. You can tell the truth earlier. You can connect strategy to execution. You can create a culture where people are not constantly asked to rescue the consequences of leadership avoidance.

But in a misaligned environment, you may see the whole pattern and still be expected to make yourself small enough to survive it.

That is not balance. It is a slow erosion.

I think a lot of people misdiagnose their burnout this way. They think the problem is ambition. They think the problem is seniority. They think the problem is that they cared too much, wanted too much, or accepted too much responsibility.

Sometimes that is true.

But sometimes the problem is not that you are leading at a high level. Sometimes the problem is that you are working in a place where the values are wrong. A place where optics matter more than honesty. A place where people talk about strategy but reward reaction. A place where the loudest voices get protected and the clearest voices get labeled difficult. A place where urgency is used to cover poor planning. A place where people are treated as replaceable until the company suddenly needs their institutional knowledge, relationships, and nervous systems to save the quarter.

“But sometimes the problem is not that you are leading at a high level. Sometimes the problem is that you are working in a place where the values are wrong.”

That kind of environment will damage you at any level.

Director. VP. CRO. Founder. Individual contributor. It does not matter.

Toxicity is not impressed by your title. And neither is your body.

What I know now is that I do not want a smaller life. I want an aligned one.

That matters because I am not someone who wants work to be meaningless. I am not wired that way. I want to build. I want to contribute. I want to make complicated things clearer. I want to help companies grow in ways that are strategic, ethical, repeatable, and real. I want the work to matter because a life spent doing work that does not matter feels like its own kind of grief.

I love the intersection of revenue, strategy, technical complexity, and human behavior. I love taking something complex and making the market understand why it matters. I love building the story behind the commercial engine. I love connecting the numbers to the people, decisions, and systems that create them.

I do not want work to be smaller. I want it to be healthier. 

My father’s death taught me that work-related stress can steal a life. My own life taught me that stepping away from a title does not automatically save one.

The real question is not, “How senior is the role?”

The real questions are harder:

Is the work aligned with who I am and what I value?

Does the environment reward honesty or punish it?

Do I have enough authority to match the responsibility I am carrying?

Am I building something meaningful, or just helping maintain dysfunction with better language?

Can I bring my full self to this work without losing myself inside it?

Those are the questions I wish more leaders asked before they burned out, broke down, walked away, or convinced themselves the only path to peace was becoming less ambitious.

I do not believe that anymore.

I believe ambition can be healthy when it is rooted in meaning. I believe leadership can be life-giving when it is aligned with truth. I believe responsibility can be carried without letting it become identity. I believe work can matter deeply without becoming the altar where everything else gets sacrificed.

So yes, I was wrong.

The title was not the thing killing me.

The misalignment was.

And maybe the answer was never to abandon leadership altogether. Maybe the answer was to return to it differently: clearer, healthier, more honest, less willing to confuse chaos with importance, and far less willing to give my whole life to work that has not earned that much of me.

Does this story resonate?

bottom of page